A tenant took law into her hands and destroyed her landlord’s property for refusing to refund her caution fee. The Cotonou lady identified as @meme_mercee on TikTok, said the landlord refused to refund her caution fee when she vacated the premises. Frustrated by this breach of agreement, she decided to take matters into her own hands and seek revenge. The video captured the lady unleashing her anger by destroying significant amenities in the house. She was seen breaking the water closet, switches, electric sockets, and other valuable items. In addition, she stained the room’s white wall with red oil and punched holes in it. Through her actions, she sent a clear message to her landlord, urging him to use her caution fee to fix the damages in his house. The video shared by the lady quickly gained attention on social media, sparking controversy and discussion. While some sympathized with her frustration and understood her need for restitution, others debated the appropriateness of her destructive actions. @Nnenna James reacted: “If you have stayed in Cotonou you we understand her. Same thing my landlord in Cotonou did to me.” @Onyinyechii1 reacted: “How much is ur caution fee dat made u do dis.” @Bigdams commented: “Dem no Dey return for Cotonou o buh just pray he doesn’t arrest you.” @Chijioke reacted: “So what do you gain now?” @JAM commented: “No educated person will do this honestly.” @Sweet Girl Ke said: “Mine I knew they wouldn’t give me my caution I travelled for a three months break, I did not pay rent for that three month, I return pack my load.” @Massage by Steve reacted: “You forgot to add cement into the toilet and sinks.” @Didi commented: “So if u stain the wall who are u doing cos you’re obviously gonna live in it..except u wanna pack out after doing this.” See the video below: https://www.tiktok.com/@meme_mercee/video/7305799439770225926?_r=1&_d=secCgYIASAHKAESPgo8xryQrQy1j%2BfPp3BZEWbSysgk1JH7x3%2BAH2uzlE1tVxs%2FDi%2FsOQQeN8W9XbSEPDYrs9RK%2BaLfRSQS00RcGgA%3D&checksum=2f9763e25f3c945ecef3d9af470849c94246362f506d95697b0cb94ad671726b&preview_pb=0&sec_user_id=MS4wLjABAAAAP_9WZ87Lc5baSaMm8wpYH5vmKEj1XJZD89b5tzGdUIWovK3rkcTI4EiUH2Ts61aV&share_app_id=1340&share_item_id=7305799439770225926&share_link_id=94e7521f-f598-4d33-9c97-d223a841c652&sharer_language=en&source=h5_m×tamp=1701103445&u_code=dbhgckd9a1ak37&ugbiz_name=Main&user_id=6810417389701727238&utm_campaign=client_share&utm_source=copy
Doris Ogala calls out Uche Elendu for suing married woman over late husband’s property
Nollywood actress, Doris Ogala called out her colleague, Uche Elendu for dragging a married woman to court over her late husband’s property. Prior to Dr. Iyke Lawson Kanu’s passing, Uche Elendu disclosed that she was lawfully married to him in a court document released by Doris Ogala on her Instagram page.
After learning of schemes to alienate his assets, the movie star is at odds with his wife and the mother of his five children over his properties, especially his estates. Doris confronted the actress and asked why she would be battling his legal wife, who is also the mother of his five children.
It is unclear when the actress and the late millionaire got married because he was out of the country on the day of their supposed wedding. Doris Ogala wrote: “Ewehhhh Uche nawa oooo chai. You carry late Etekebe wife go court to drag her husband’s property. Jesus “With a marriage certificate that was dated that he married you on the 6th of May, 2022.
While Etekebe was not even in the country on the 6th of May, 2022. “His passport shows he returned to Nigeria on the 8th of May, 2022 from the UK. “So who did you marry on the 6th of May, 2022? Na wa oo. I am coming”. “Kai Uche Elendu nawa ooo, this is not fair na. Haba Kai. This man married his wife in court 2004 legally with 5 children, chai. This is so unfair”. In a follow-up post, Doris disclosed that the court paperwork prevents his wife from accessing her late husband’s assets, such as bank accounts and insurance policies. She said: “JESUS..NAWA OOOOO HEEEEEHHH UCHE ELENDU WHY NAU… HABA ..ETEKEBE MARRIED HIS WIFE LEGITIMATELY IN COURT IN 2004.. THEY HAVE 5 CHILDREN… AH AHH… HA, WHAT KIND OF DESPERATION IS THIS?” SEE POSTS:
“Another daddy’s property; second user” – Lil smart disses Zinoleesky’s new Ferrari
Popular dancer and ex Marlian music member, Lil Smart has alleged that popular singer Zinoleesky’s car belonged to his ‘daddy’ and he’s just a second user. The socialite took to social media to reveal this after Zinoleesky showed off the beautiful ride on his Instagram page.
Lil smart disses Zinoleesky’s new Ferrari. Photo Credit: Lil Smart. Source: Instagram. This comes amidst beef between the singer and his colleague Seyi Vibez. The duo have apparently been having a battle of words on who’s the bigger artist.
Lil smart disses Zinoleesky’s new Ferrari. Photo Credit: Zinoleesky. Source: Instagram. Lil Smart who has joined the fray took to his Instagram page to drag him, alleging that the car isn’t a new one but belongs to his daddy, Naira Marley who’s the Record boss.
Lil smart disses Zinoleesky’s new Ferrari. Photo Credit: Zinoleesky. Source: Instagram. In a now-deleted comment, he wrote: “Another Daddy’s property. congrats to the second user!’ In another post, lil Smart wrote; “Just been myself dont take it personal” don take am personal ooo Tension mu werey We all know say na Daddy’s Money @ “No Daddy’s money here We send money to Daddy here”
“Fuel stations caught hoarding products will lose their landed property”
The government of Edo State has warned fuel stations and dealers against hoarding their petroleum products following subsidy withdrawal. This warning from the Edo government comes after news of hikes in fuel prices and long queues at fuel stations surfaced online a few hours after President Tinubu announced the removal of subsidy on fuel. Edo Gov. warns fuel station owners. Photo credit: Google In a statement released by Osaigbovo Iyoha, the Chief of Staff to Governor Godwin Obaseki to fuel stations hoarding their petroleum products, he said; “The attention of Edo State Government has been drawn to the unscrupulous attempt by petrol dealers in the state to hoard fuel and create artificial scarcity and price hike. As a responsible government that cares for its citizens, we shall resist this economic sabotage by every legal means possible. To this end, all petrol stations are ordered to immediately resume sales of the products to Edo people or risk immediate closure, and possible revocation of their property to enable others who want to do legitimate and respectful business in Edo State to come and invest,” the statement said. It added that the government cannot continue to allow extortion of Edo people in whatever guise, warning that “a word is enough for the wise.”
“I can’t argue with you if you don’t own a property”
Nigerian singer, BNXN formerly known as Buju has caused a stir on social media, following his most recent declaration.
BNXN, whose real name is Daniel Benson was in the news last week, following his altercation with an influencer, caramel Plugg over a comment during a podcast. BNXN has also been involved in online beef with his colleague, Ruger, over superiority. A recent post by the music talent has set tongues wagging. He announced to his fans that he would not be found arguing with those who do not own properties. In his words: “I’m choosing my peace every single time.
I can’t argue with you if you don’t own property, like hello ?
Find God and find money”
Kenya ends 50% property share for couples after a divorce
The Supreme Court of Kenya has ruled that spouses are not entitled to a 50/50 share of property after divorce.
Following the landmark ruling by the five-man Supreme Court judges, couples are no longer automatically entitled to a 50 % share of property in case of a divorce. The judges said spouses would have to prove their contribution to the marital property amassed before sharing in the event of a divorce. This is opposed to the controversial traditional assumption that one was entitled to a 50 % share. The Court also stated that while Article 45(3) of the Constitution deals with equality of the fundamental rights of spouses during the dissolution of a marriage, such equality does not mean the re-distribution of proprietary rights or an assumption that spouses are automatically entitled to a 50 percent share by the fact of being married.
The ruling came in response to an appeal filed by Joseph Ombogi Ogentoto, who sought to overturn a decision by the Court of Appeal that ordered the matrimonial property and rental units in the property be shared equally between himself and his estranged wife, Martha Bosibori Ogentoto. The two were married under Abagusii customary law in 1990 and later formalized their union under the repealed Marriage Act in 1995. During the subsistence of the marriage, the couple acquired a matrimonial home and constructed rental units on the property. However, in 2008, the marriage broke down and the couple decided to dissolve the marriage. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and in its judgment, stated that there is no retrospective application of the Matrimonial Property Act and that the applicable law to claims filed before the commencement of the Act is the Married Women Property Act, of 1882. However, the Court clarified that nothing bars the provisions of Article 45(3) of the Constitution from being applied retrospectively.
Moment SS3 students vandalize school property after principal fled with their WAEC fees and put up the school for sale [Video]
Tension and uncertainty has shrouded the atmosphere around a secondary school in Edo state, as students go on rampage after discovering that their principal has swindled them.
The Senior Secondary (SS3) students, according to reports, had arrived the school premises to take their West African School Certificate Examination, WAEC, only to discover that the head of the school has put it up for sale and absconded with the examination fees
To this end, the embittered students resorted to violence as they vandalize the school property.
A video capturing the scenes is currently making the rounds.
Watch Video Below
Reacting, a concerned Nigerian wrote: “Let them sell what they can from the school property. By the way, ASUU just try and include secondary school in this strike, as in how can a comrade be washing plates for his junior siblings.”
Warere hotel in Zanzibar narrates side of story with 23-year-old Nigerian lady who was assaulted on their property
Hours after being called out for negligence, Warere Hotel in Zanzibar breaks silence as it narrates what transpired with a Nigerian lady, Zainab Oladehinde.
The 23-year-old lady had called out the hotel over her sour experience after escaping an attempted rape while sleeping in her room.
Warere Hotel addressed the issue in a public statement via its Instagram page where it stated that it had lost its rating from 4+ stars to lesser than one following a flood of negative reviews the news had cost them.
Clarifying the incident that was recorded on their with their client, Zainab, the hotel wrote;
“Following accusations of sexual assault through various social media platforms by a Ms Zainab Oladehinde, who stayed at our Warere Hotel in April 2021 as a guest, we would like to add our detailed account of the alleged event in a clearer perspective as hereunder:
Firstly we would like to mention from the outset that it is not our policy to responci publicly to any personal issues encountered by our guests. However due to the fact that the said guest decided to go public, we feel, though reluctantly, that we are duty bound to respond and put the record of the alleged event in its totality.
This is so, particularly since the said news was posted that our Warere Website was hacked and we were inundated by a massive release of negative messages. Within 3 hours we have received 4,000 negative reviews on Google from people who had never stayed at our Hotel but simply tended to believe a one sided story.
It is true that we had Ms Zainab Oladehinde as our guest coming from Nigeria who arrived in APRIL, 2021. It is also true that she reported to our Management that a male security personnel (who is not our employee but was posted at our Hotel by the Security Company) went to her room and attempted to have sxxual intercourse with her.
Immediately we directed and assisted her to report the matter at the nearby Police Station as this is a criminal matter and falls under police jurisdiction to investigate and take appropriate legal measures.
The Police took her statement of complaint and accordingly the accused person (a staff member of the security company) was immediately arrested, detained and interrogated by the Police. However, to everybody’s surprise the Accused gave a different account of what happened.
He denied any wrong doing on his part and insisted that it was the Complainant who requested him to go to her room for a love affair. He said he got into the room with her permission and he did not break the door nor enter the room through other techniques.
When he got into the room she asked him to go and fetch a condom so that they will both be safe. He went out of the room to look for a condom and when he came back he was shocked to find out that the same woman was complaining that there was an attempted sexual assault.
All the same the Police decided that this was a Court Case and they were willing to pursue the matter in accordance with the existing laws. However it seemed, to our bewilderment, that Ms Zainab was not interested in pursuing the matter criminally with the Police.
She decided to go to the District Commissioner (North A District) where we were summoned and where she demanded payment of USD Ten Thousand from us. We attended 2 meetings at the District Commissioner.
We insisted that this was basically a criminal issue and we failed to understand her hesitation to pursue it as such, despite our readiness for any assistance. On payment of the amount she demanded we explain that such payment could be justified if at face value the alleged event was not controverteci by the Accused.
Under the circumstances where the Accused is denying any wrong doing then the proper cause was to pursue it as a Civil Case where she can sue the Accused, his Employer a. can even join the Warere.
She was adamant on this and was insisting on payment of USD Ten Thousand or she would tarnish our good image through social media, something she is doing after a lapse of a one year period.
As a woman-owned and operated business, the Warere takes guest safety and the safety of single women travelers extremely seriously, as evidenced by 6 years of verified positive reviews from women all over the world.
We tried our best to support Ms Zainab as soon as we learned of the accusations We immectiately brought her to the police and offered her support. The case was brought before Government authorities in April 2021 when it occurred. The police report indicated that this was a personal case, and not negligence on the part of the Warere.
After passing by the Zanzibar Nungwi Police, the District Commissioners Office, the Regional Commissioners Office and the office of the Second Vice President of the go, of Zanzibar, Ms. Zainab declined to take the case further.
Ms Zainab Oladehinde demanded a cash payment for damages from the Warere and was informed that the hotel would abide by damages rewarded by the court system of Zanzibar.
It is our assurance that we will continue to serve our guests from all corners of the world with the same level of hospitality and excellence that we have become known for throughout Zanzibar over the past six years.”